Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::open($save_path, $name) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::open(string $path, string $name): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::close() should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::close(): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::read($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::read(string $id): string|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::write($session_id, $session_data) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::write(string $id, string $data): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::destroy($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::destroy(string $id): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::gc($maxlifetime) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::gc(int $max_lifetime): int|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/franchi4/public_html/legal/system/core/Exceptions.php:271)
This article has been composed to clear the whole bits of gossip which are being spread to make disorder between the normal individuals. A message is being flowed in the online networking that GST should be obligated to be paid when an individual pitches his old gems to the gem dealer under invert charge since this might be considered as supply.
Be that as it may, against reality, there is no legitimacy in the message which is being flowed. As it were, neither the individual nor the goldsmith is subject to pay the GST on the offer of old gems including gold trimmings, rings, chain and so forth.
How the gossip got the wings?
As a matter of fact, this point was asked to the income secretary in one of the live session, where income secretary erroneously addressed that GST might be at risk to be paid under switch charge on the offer of old adornments. Subsequently, when it is being replied by the master, it circulates around the web on the media which brought about superfluous frenzy.
Illumination by the administration
When this news got viral and made an issue, the administration needs to think of an illumination expressed that there is no GST to be exacted on this exchange of offer of old adornments on the grounds that the individual isn't a customary merchant and consequently, this exchange might not be dealt with as supply.
There, no GST might be demanded on the offer of old gems by a person to adornments.